Essentialist philosophy of training is characterized by the systematic and disciplined manner of transmission of the knowledge. From existentialist perspective, emphasis is positioned on the moral and intellectual requirements by which schools need to teach. As such, the curriculum centered on the academic rigor, know-how and skills that are essential to the learner. Essentialism proponents factor out that core curriculum is bound to change and therefore, getting to know needs to be practical as the college students are prepared to develop into precious and respected society members.
Furthermore, essentialism is said to promote non-public consideration in which teachers are expected to mould the students to develop their choices, beliefs, and non-public character. The primary focus of the method is to empower students to direct their learning by finding meaning on their own. By the students learning to define what is true or false, they define themselves rather than letting the community to define them. In existentialism, a teacher in a classroom setting lays out what is felt to be important and the student is allowed to make a choice regarding what they want to study. Therefore, the teachers become facilitators by directing the students so that they can discover the appropriate methods and materials to work on the self-selected assignments and at their pace.
One of the disadvantages that arise with existentialism is the self-definition of what is right and what is false may at times be invalidated as a result of bias. As one perceives life from an individualistic and conscious perspective, there are chances that the person will create what they believe to be true and yet it might not be acceptable universally. Also, the extent to which one takes responsibility for an action is limited to how the person perceives the behavior.