Meaning of the story
In the 19th century, women were required to be elusive and submissive. The heart condition of Louse Mallard strengthens this societal anticipation. Louise’s physical feebleness also encourages the people surrounding her, such as Josephine and Richard, to stifle her emotions. The reaction by Louise about the sad news of her husband’s death generates tension because it goes contrary to the sexist expectation in society. It similarly defines the limitations related to her body health. For instance, Louise cries into the arms of Josephine with wild abandon, not like other women in society when met with bad news.
The desire of Louise to be alone with her sorrow is a preliminary sign of her predisposition towards independence. It is shown particularly with how she handles her sentiments. Compliant with a notion that she is weak, although she is exhausted physically by dint of sobbing.
Women were supposed to live in the social and financial regulation of their hubbies. From the story, Louise distinguishes an unusual opportunity where she now has to flee patriarchal dynamics. She recognizes her freedom of self-control to be robust — “the strongest impulse of her being”—again dares the formerly traditional conception about her weakness (Chopin, 2013). However, in earlier times in her marriage’s despotic control, Louise was seen as reliant on other people. Now, her self-contention gives her both emotionally and physically and freedom, just as proven by her expletive, “Body and soul free!” (Chopin, 2013)
How actual words, events, characters, or other elements contribute to the understanding story’s meaning?
The characters in the story give various themes. For instance, the subject of freedom and independence has been exhibited by Louise. Liberty and independence make like worth living but not marriage, friends, honor, and family. Events such as death enable one to comprehend the deeper meaning of the story, similar to how the demise of Brently Mallard through a train accident freed Louise from patriarchal dictatorial.
Issues of doubt, faith, or trust
Since his childhood, my father’s younger brother has been doubting everything about the existence of any disease. Being brought up in a Christian family, where religion is believed to be the cure for all sicknesses, he believed that sickling is the devil’s work. That through faith and prayer, he would never become sick. I refuted his claims, and we were always in a dispute concerning our stand on falling sick. It was not until late that he became ill and was taken to the hospital. Admittedly, he knew all that afflicted were the devil’s doing. While in hospital, he was not comfortable and believed that the doctors were Satan’s agents. The understanding gives me an insight into the experiences of Young Goodman Brown. From the period he enters the forest, Goodman Brown expresses his distress in such inhospitable surroundings, viewing the forest as a place that has not right wholly. Here, he reverberates the leading viewpoint of Puritans in the 17th century, who had a belief that first wild-land which was to be feared then taken over later. Goodman Brown, just as other Puritans, relates forest to native “Indians.” He trusts they may be inhabiting such places effortlessly. He finally meets the devil himself as he had anticipated (Hawthorne, 2015). He similarly takes to the opinion that the forest is considered dark, devilish, and frightening. Goodman Brown becomes contented within the forest only when he has thrown in the towel to evil.
Chopin, K. (2013). The story of an hour. Blackstone Audio.
Hawthorne, N. (2015). Young Goodman Brown. Booklassic.