- Google search: Blood Sugar
- 37,800,000 results
Ideally, anyone can publish on the web, and thus web users must evaluate the credibility of Internet information. Credible information comes from sources written by authors who are respected in their field of expertise. It also comes from sites associated with reputable institutions such as government institutions, recognized universities, or prominent non-governmental organizations. For instance, when seeking information on blood sugar, the site, MedlinePlus retrieved from https://medlineplus.gov/bloodsugar.html, can be considered a reliable source. The site provides comprehensive information from the National Institute of Health and other scholarly sources. Moreover, the domain .gov implies the site is a registered government institution, and thus it contains trustworthy information (Aggarwal, Van Oostendorp, Reddy, & Indurkhya, 2014).
Next, information retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_sugar is not credible. Although Wikipedia has extensive information that can be used, it is designed to be a collaborative and continuously expanding encyclopedia, and thus anyone can create or edit a wiki page. For instance, the page on blood sugar was created by heterogeneous contributors with questionable credibility, thereby raising doubts about the information’s trustworthiness. Therefore, the site cannot be used as a scholarly reference to support discussions and assignments.
With the fast-growing body of knowledge, people are increasingly becoming reliant on nutrition information from different sources, websites, blogs, and other online articles. The greatest challenge about sifting through such information is the issue of misinformation and misinterpretation of health claims. However, the problem can be overcome by getting nutrition information from reliable addresses characterized by the following domains .edu, .org, or .gov (Bellows & Moore, 2013). It is also important to examine the author’s qualifications in the field of nutrition and dietetics. Lastly, accurate information should be peer-reviewed, science-based, and replicable.
Aggarwal, S., Van Oostendorp, H., Reddy, R., & Indurkhya, B. (2014). Providing web credibility assessment support. Proceedings Of The 2014 European Conference On Cognitive Ergonomics.
Bellows, L. & Moore, R. (2013). Nutrition misinformation: How to identify fraud and misleading claims. Colorado State University Extension. http://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/nutrition-food-safety-health/nutrition-misinformation-how-to-identify-fraud-and-misleading-claims-9-350/