Life of Julius Agricola

Introduction

“Agricola” is a paper by a Roman representative and student of history Tacitus in applause for his dad-in-law, Roman general Gnaeus Julius Agricola. Composed c. 98 AD, five years after Agricola’s demise, the work includes a few sorts. In one sense, it is a memoir, a classification that in antiquated Greece and Rome could likewise include history and speech. “Agricola” additionally serves the capacity of a memorial service address, a discourse lauding the perished that is intended to give solace to his survivors. Tacitus’ absence of particularity concerning dates, individuals, and spots do not fulfil the guidelines of current students of history. Hence, a few researchers trust his work is best comprehended as an artistic work through which Tacitus gives a tribute to a regarded general and contemplation on oppression and its outcomes. This purpose of this paper is to examine deeds of Agricola and all evils that Domitian carried out during his reign.

Have any questions about the topic? Our Experts can answer any question you have. They are avaliable to you 24/7.
Ask now

It is true that Agricola was a great leader as it ispresented in the excerpt. The moment he was appointed as an emperor of Syria Province, he re-establish friendly relations with citizens since the past regime had created enormity with them. Also Agricola at the period he was taking part the war, he kept an eye on the steps of the enemy and planned strategies of winning battles. “He could make sure that enemy has no break, positioning waste his land with unexpected invasions, and, having satisfactorily alarmed them and could then restraint exhibit the signs of peace” (Ag.20). In that effect, a number of states, which to that period had been in-helpless, gave captives, and leave behind their hostilities; forts and garrisons were come up with diligence and skill with which no newly assimilated part of England had before been handled. Furthermore, Agricola during his reign, he repeatedly disclosed himself in the ranks, acclaimed decent discipline, and reserved the dawdlers in order.

After the death of Rufus Atilus, Agricola was appointed to head of Syria. He was chosen because he was a visionary and dedicated servant who had won battles. Several individuals that were known to be freedmen were hired on secret services were reporting to Agricola, having a despatch in which the province of Syria was handed to him. In addition to that, the guidelines were to be provided in the English so that all the freedmen crossing could move directly to Agricola for advices. Agricola also prove that he was a great man, he handed over peaceful his province to the next king and wished him all the best. This show that he was not megalomaniac but was loyal to the constitution and people. “Lastly, entered into Rome not noticeable by the concourse of warm multitudes; he evaded the attention of his associates by arriving to town at late hours of the night when everyone is asleep” (Ag.40). He progressed to the palace where he was welcome with a quick embrace and without a word being uttered, he associated in the crowd of self-seekers. This demonstrates that he was not a boastful but humble leader. Although he had great success, he didn’t live to boast about those victories.

From the essay, it is right that Domitian was a wicked emperor as we can first see when he was teenager. He was after his dad’s support that sought merely to enjoy chance of sympathy. “Because of many events, nonetheless not overstated in the messages of Agricola by any bragging of language, Domitian received, as was his habit, with happiness in his face but nervousness in his heart. He felt mindful that all men laughed at his late mock conquer over Germany, for which there had been purchased from traders’ persons whose dress and hair may be made to resemble those of prisoners” (Ag.39). From this statement, it infers that Domitian was not happy with the success of Agricola; his heart was not in peace because people were celebrating someone whose supremacy of powers were lower than that of him. Likewise, he lost the support of the army since they shift loyalty to the Agricola.

Domitian allowed other individuals to accused the Agricola for the mistakes he didn’t commit and without allowing to defend himself. This accusation was false, and this was a good chance for Domitian to revenge against the Agricola. Domitian was in the central portion of the desolations that seen and heard that groans were being documented, having, ever prepared to note the sallow appearances of numerous such faces, that severe expression enflamed with the type with which he challenged disgrace. “However, by staying until the morning of his most contented age and to see a Trajan on the sovereignty was what could guess upon in previsions and desires confessed to his ears. Hitherto he had this massive recompense for his early death, that he was out of danger those later years up to which Domitian, leaving currently no break or breathing space of time, nonetheless, as it were, with one unceasing blow, drained the life-blood of the State” (Ag.44).. From these instances, it proofs that Domitian was inhuman. He was full of hatred and only needed best for himself; he considered other people like Agricola as useless being. In addition to that, it is of the higher probability that Domitian had poison Agricola to death since he was a great enemy.

There are many instances where Agricola exhibited obedience and submission- one is where he was appointed to rule of Syria, he obeyed the order and follow the guidelines that are needed from a leader. Also when his time as a leader expires as a king of Syria, he steps down and paves the way for a new a leader, he didn’t continue to clinch to power like what other people does. During the time he was entering the city, he entered it peaceful and quietly since he was submissive and he didn’t like to be seen, although he had won many battles against their enemies, he was not happy with a multitude welcoming him. During the battle, he was somebody of few words and calculated his moves in order to overcome the enemy. He gave instructions to his juniors in a precise and submissive manner. At no time, did we see the soldiers complaining, since their leader (Agricola) was kind. He was a person who was approachable as we can see freedmen passes where he was to get instruction. He could provide guidance concerning how to win battles and also concerning running the government. With his humility and obedience, it made rulers of that time to give him more power, e.g., to be emperor of Syria. He wins their hearts and also those of the people of Syria. It is true that after assuming the office, he asks for forgiveness for sins that his predecessors had committed and provide enjoyable services to enable the citizens.

 

Work cited

https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/ancient/tacitus-agricola.asp