Honesty and loyalty are two values which are not similar in any way although many people tend to forget the difference between the two. Honesty means telling the truth about something or rather somebody without any attempt of lying. Conversely, loyalty is a dedication and devotion to somebody or just a particular thing. However, loyalty sometimes allows for lies to the protection of interest, and this forms the base of the difference between honesty and loyalty (Malmstrom, Frederick, and David 12).
Additionally, honesty leads to loyalty, but loyalty cannot lead to honesty. People tend to be loyal rather than being honest, and this is entirely psychological in many aspects. The reason why most people embrace loyalty is that in a way or another, there is guilt that is formed when one fails to lie to protect the interest or fail to be loyal by practicing honesty.
Loyalty is a practice that most of us are subjected to due to the everyday occurrence that requires our report as witnesses. In a case where a friend cheats on his or her partner involves loyalty rather than honesty. We are always not ready to betray our loyal friends unless we had previously crossed each other’s line. The loyalty here is that we cannot let the other partner who is being cheated on because of the feeling that they might separate (Graham et al., 156). As a result, we tend to show more concern to our loyal friends by blinding the other so that things do not get ugly leading to separation in our names.
Loyalty involves protecting the reputation we have created in the minds of our friends, and we usually struggle to maintain what we have achieved even if it means hurting the other party. Additionally, loyalty carries guilt in it for our actions or reports we make that are not in favor of our friends usually impact them at a high degree. Lies sometimes help solve situations and maintaining the concern and care we have towards those around us.
Therefore, loyalty is sometimes required instead of honesty which usually makes situations push our loyal friends to the extreme. Obedience usually arises from allegiance to something, someone or laws. An excellent history of the “perils of obedience” tries to explain that loyalty is more practiced than honesty.
At Abu Ghraib, many people, especially from the underdeveloped countries, were subjected to various forms of torture both physical and emotional. The detainees faced the most challenging part of life through different kinds of inhuman acts. The soldiers were harsh on the detainees to the point of losing their humanity and picking up animalistic characters. Chairs were used to beat up the detainees, and wooden broom handles in addition to pouring phosphoric acids and cold water on the naked detainees (Malmstrom, Frederick, and David 12).
Furthermore, the males were threatened with rape and the sodomizing others with chemical light and broomsticks. The soldiers used the police dogs as frightening and intimidating tools for threatening the detainees. Many questionable acts by the soldiers still post challenges as per their inhuman actions such as handcuffing detainees on the doorposts leaving them naked or in underpants (Yazdanpanahi et al., 597). The military intelligence gave orders, and the soldiers had to show loyalty by following them to the latter for fear of the consequences of disobedience. Precisely, we tend to be loyal rather than being honest as the event narrates.
A young woman from part of New York met her death by stabbing in the middle of the streets. All seems weird that this case was never taken to consideration even though it was a quite rare case. Many people saw the event happening, but nobody got out of the house or alarmed the police officers to go for her rescue (Graham et al., 165). There were some people with the humanitarian norms to help the lady, but the fear of what may have happened to them could not allow them to set their foot outside to do something.
Some people even feared to contact the police officers due to the procedures that they may have followed or being taken as witnesses of the situation. The failure of the neighbors to help the young woman may raise several questions, but it can be justified that they feared what would have happened to them in case they stepped out to help (Malmstrom, Frederick, and David 12). Each one of the neighbors waited for one person to act because their thoughts were diffused on who to help and who to blame.
The case is for self-loyalty where no one wants to get involved as they are trying to satisfy their interest by being loyal to them. Stanley Milgram was a psychologist who experimented loyalty to the authority and the personal conscience justifying the activities of killing during World War II. He found that everything was an absolute power of the social pressure that was present at that time (Malmstrom, Frederick, and David 12).
The experiment was essential and recognizable because it provides a base for reference in explaining loyalty to power. Milgram tries to tell that most people can hurt their fellows in respect for the law that comes out of commitment to people in power. Many people find it easy to follow the rules or the interests of other people above their hierarchy rather than going against them. In this case, they find it easy to hurt their fellow human beings to show their loyalty to the law and the people above them (Yazdanpanahi et al., 598).
Additionally, people may expect rewards in return or as a payment for loyal to an order given or for fear of consequences of disobedience for the belief that the laws are authentic. Some people may go an extra mile to obeying the rules that infringe their rights and commit various crimes just because of loyalty. Furthermore, situations can incite some behaviors that are not out of character in the influence of conformity with other undertaking inhuman actions.
Precisely, people tend to value loyalty than honesty as allegiance carries with its rewards, protecting the interest and various consequences. The practice of loyalty is simpler than fixing a personality of being honest, a practice that does not allow for lying to protect other’s interest. According to many people, being loyal is more important than being honest as loyalty protects the interest of the other party even if they are on the wrong side (Mohd et al., 15).
Moreover, loyalty shows a high level of devotion to somebody, and this shows a high level of trust and true friendship. Loyalty is mainly practiced in situations that bring factors that may hurt our interests, people we love or just orders that may affect us negatively. Assuredly, we tend to value loyalty than honesty.
Graham, Jesse, et al. “When values and behavior conflict: Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 9.3 (2015): 158-170.
Malmstrom, Frederick V., and David Mullin. “Why whistleblowing doesn’t work: loyalty is a whole lot easier to enforce than honesty.” Skeptic (Altadena, CA) 19.1 (2014): 30-36.
Mohd, Rohani, et al. “Can Value of Honesty, Hard Work, Loyalty and Discipline Predict Entrepreneurial Orientation of Muslim Owner Managers?.” Journal of Emerging Economies & Islamic Research 3.1 (2015).
Yazdanpanahi, Zahra, et al. “Ethics and Sentences in Midwifery.” Iranian journal of public health 44.4 (2015): 598-9.